Sony vegas pro 14 free download full version Archives

WikiProject Brands		BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.  ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I think the title should be changed to something like "Sony Vegas" to be more consistent with the naming convention applied to similar programs such as "Adobe Premiere Pro" and "Pinnacle Studio". —This unsigned comment is by Zunaid (talk • contribs) 2005-10-26 21:20:00.

Piracy Section[edit]

The spin on the Piracy section makes me really want to Pirate this software. The wikipedia entry here practically gives instructions on how to pirate Vegas, as well as arguments to convince folks that this is a fair way to "own" the software.

• It costs $599 and some people don't want to pay that much. That's fair I suppose.
• What about the development costs or costs of Piracy to the company?
• "Many people choose to use illigitimate methods to own Vegas." If it's pirated, then they don't own it , by definition. This section should stop here.
• Step 1, lookup Torrent, note that it'll work for free.
• Step 2, here's how to make your pirated version look unpirated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.47.105.111 (talk) 05:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Cleanup[edit]

I've moved some recent additions around and cleaned them up. Also added box art for the main product. Plenty of statements requiring citation. Garglebutt / (talk) 01:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I've made some fairly major changes[edit]

Added some detail to the features, that little info box at the right and also some links to some of the things that needed citations, but I don't know how to make citations!--Tagliare 03:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Edit: never mind, I've figured it out (how to make citations)--Tagliare 03:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I've made (more) major changes[edit]

I've organised the article a bit, splitting the material into "history" "features and etc. I also added a ton of material into "features", as well as cleaning up the history section. I also added more critisism of the product. --Tagliare 06:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Additions[edit]

I've added new/better screenshots, as well as a media format table.--Tagliare 06:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Good work on this. Garglebutt / (talk) 07:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Some of the images work better on the right for multiple screen resolutions. Left aligned tends to break the paragraph flow and can lead to indented section headings. Garglebutt / (talk) 07:14, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Vegas 7.0[edit]

vegas is now 7.0

[[1]]

Awfully glowing entry[edit]

The entry steps really close to POV with all the wonderful things to say about the software. Even the criticism section offers praise. --24.249.108.133 00:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I second this. The whole article reads so glowingly about Vegas that I have a hard time believing it wasn't written by a SONY employee sent on a mission to create this page. (Who knows; maybe it was.) --66.219.188.129 03:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

I disagree. The obvious is only being pointed out. Both praise and criticism is noted. And what is wrong with praise, as long as it is factual?

I second that. While the overall tone of the article feels positive, the writer does an adequate job of backing up the statements with rationale and facts.(Myscrnnm 05:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC))

I agree with the first two posts; this article seems biased. The page to me appears as if written by either devoted fans of Vegas or Sony employees themselves. Even though it might be true that Vegas is the best editing program available (I have not used Vegas myself), then the page still has the sound of a sales article - even the criticisms turns out to be strong points. I wonder what Sony will have to change for their next version of Vegas? --118.71.213.120 (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

It's not so much biased as written in the language of a sales brochure. It's unsurprising that an enthusiast of the subject should want to write about it - this applies to all of Wikipedia - but the articles for some of Sony Vegas's competitors manage to have more of the feeling of encyclopaedia entries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.134.175 (talk) 09:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Vegas was first in this, Vegas was first in that, Vegas kicks ass, Vegas is the best, Vegas had this years ago, Vegas is great, Vegas... Give me a break. You have to be very dense not to see this was written either by a fanboi or Sony. Nikos (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

I just had to check this discussion page for this reason. There simply is no criticism. One thing to start with could be a comparison regarding the handling of sequences of video material with large complex projects. In Final Cut Pro, for instance, you don't have to leave your project to switch between different sequence edits. In Vegas they offer as an equivalent the feature of nesting projects, which is a much clumsier and more cluttery way to handle this. Additionally, for nested projects large audio proxy files have to be rendered, which also takes time. This difference makes Vegas much less attractive for large film projects and also explains, why in the "Adwards" section you only find music clips and documentaries cited. - Another thing is, that you have only one preview window, unlike Avid, FCP or Premiere. So you can not view your frame on the timeline and try to find a match from other clips at the same time. - As for the pace of development of the software you can say that the basic interface has not changed in years and real innovation happens at a fairly small scale. It has mostly been made up of the implementation of support for new formats and new cameras (and, ok, full screen video preview for single display setups as of version 8). In fact, regarding audio (lack of clip-based effects) and handling of automation, Vegas is comparatively behind. - User support is another point that should be mentioned. The article claims "The online community of Vegas users has produced a vast array of such scripts which can be downloaded and run without any scripting knowledge." Well, tell me where, so I can verify. Is Sony helping to it? If you were just using a trial version of vegas, you cannot even ask Sony a question about it, because you have no serial number for a registered product. So you cannot find out about scripts and if Sony provides a upload/download portal for those. There are more major things that I'd think should be covered here, which would be useful for readers to find out about the strengths and downsides of different video editing applications. I'll try to remember and come back for this when I have more time. - Again, I agree the article comes along too much like a vendor sheet. --85.179.8.32 (talk) 00:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

As a user of Vegas, Premier, and Final Cut Pro, I'm confused as to why the ones above are complaining. Sound like they are the biased ones!? I myself posted a criticism or two but compared to Premier and FCP, there are many positive things to say, and historically Vegas was first in many things -- something worth mentioning in an Encyclopedia for perspective. Nevertheless the article could be cleaned up. Babahu (talk) 22:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

8.0 information needed[edit]

Someone needs to adapt the new information from this site for info on Vegas Pro 8 in the article and if possible, get a screenshot. --Jack Zhang 12:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Done. --12:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DVDArchitect4 Full.jpg[edit]

Image:DVDArchitect4 Full.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vegas7 ColorCorrector.jpg[edit]

Image:Vegas7 ColorCorrector.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vegas7 SurroundPanner.jpg[edit]

Image:Vegas7 SurroundPanner.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vegas8-home.jpg[edit]

Image:Vegas8-home.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vegaspro8 32BitColorSpace.jpg[edit]

Image:Vegaspro8 32BitColorSpace.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Wrong[edit]

This sounds more like an advertisement/someone telling me about a product vs the encyclopedia feel. Colinstu (talk) 06:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I think it's a bit strange, but all studios I tour/visit for computer "repair" (mainly, somebody can't empty a trash/recycle bin) see to be Avid, Media 100, Final Cut, etc. Just an observation. Most consumers I visit who aren't using Apple have this program installed. And yes, this article seems more like an ad than anything. Japanimation station (talk) 15:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

As a user of Vegas I read the entry as accurate description, no more enthusiastic than an Apple user writing about features of an iphone. I would like to know what is it about the writing that makes it advertisement? Babahu (talk) 22:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

First?[edit]

'Vegas was the first NLE that allowed you to put a variety of formats on the timeline and just edit them. Other NLEs would require you to render or "conform" these down to a single format.' I'm pretty sure Adobe Premiere never required any sort of conforming prior to the "Pro" versions, so I would question the accuracy of this statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.176.52.65 (talk) 23:49, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

I remember switching from Premiere to Vegas because of this reason. Premiere could only import very little else than DV, and they long time stubbornly rejected even acknowleding that a lot of people had started using found or second hand footage for art work. Adobe's standard answer used to be, that professionals do not work with that kind of material. If you still question the accuracy of the statement, come up with facts. --85.179.8.32 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I switched to Vegas from both Premier and Final Cut Pro as Vegas was much more flexible, accepted many formats, required no rendering, and did simple editing and transitions much faster, i.e. fewer clicks or mouse moves. Only recently has Premier and FCP caught up, so Vegas was the "first." Babahu (talk) 22:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Awards - not exactly[edit]

The fact that Vegas has been used by engineers and artists, doesn't really have any relevance to awards. The statements are fairly general and mention various recording artists, and goes further to say the that the software is popular for documentaries. It seems this section doesn't really belong here and lacks any real reference. Cerealbox (talk) 10:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I know a number of people who use Vegas. They make money with the videos they edit. They fit the category of vis a vis musicians, engineers, and indie / documentary makers. Perhaps since Vegas works better on lower power machines the poorer the user the more likely they use Vegas? Half of a joke. But awards....hmmm...perhaps the title is wrong. Babahu (talk) 22:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Seems like advertisement not a Encyclopedic article[edit]

"This article comes off as a complete and utter advertisement for this product rather than an encyclopedic article with no bias. I mean my god, it seems like Sony wrote this article for god's sake."

This unsigned comment seems to have the same problem. There are no references or details. Almost as if the commenter has a negative backstory -- i.e. wants to put Vegas down a notch, or doesn't like Vegas. Babahu (talk) 22:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Screenshot / Article picture useless.[edit]

Seriously,

what's the point of uploading such a low-res version of a program interface? The screenshot is too low resolution to illustrate the point of the article. Either delete it or upload a higher resolution per Wiki fair use policy ASAP.

Page should be moved[edit]

This product is no longer called Sony Vegas Pro as of version 14. MAGIX, the new developer of this software, lists it on their website as Vegas Pro. I feel this page should be moved to a new page called "Vegas Pro", however I lack the experience to properly make the move in a way that follows Wikipedia guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:189:1:DE10:CD12:FD88:5631:2663 (talk) 21:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vegas Pro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template (last update: 15 July 2018).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 03:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vegas Pro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template (last update: 15 July 2018).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 23:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Missing historic info[edit]

I would like to know WHEN the first version came out, WHEN it was sold to Sony. The information that it was sold I knew already but I have the expectation to an encyclopedia that it's a bit more specific. When doing research I'd like to be able to see what features the software had when it was used for some editing. --Panoramedia (talk) 09:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Films edited with Vegas Pro[edit]

Should we add a list of films that were edited with Vegas Pro?

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Sony Vegas Pro 14 Free Download – Sony Vegas Pro 14 is a video editing software that was released not too long ago and is a predecessor of the previous Sony Vegas Pro 13. A lot of youtubers and professional movie makers are using Sony Vegas Pro 14. Learn how to download and Install Sony Vegas Pro 14 for free in this article and be sure to share with your friends.

               SONY VEGAS PRO 14 OVERVIEW

Sony Vegas Pro 14 is a professional video editing software which is very popular among youtube content creators and professional movie makers. The number of users have skyrocketed over the years and still remains the number 1 choice of editing software. This article will tell you how to download Sony Vegas Pro 14 full version for FREE. You can create montages using special editing effects, use color palate to brighten your video or lower the contrast, and even add special effects to make your video look more real. You have infinite numbers of effects you can use to make your video the best. You can even use slow motion and other tools in Sony Vegas Pro 14.

      HOW TO DOWNLOAD & INSTALL SONY VEGAS PRO 14

1. Click the Download button or the logo below and you should be redirected to MEGA.

2. Click Download through your web browser or Download with MEGASync to start your download. (For web browser downloading, you should use chrome and have the MEGA extension installed).

3. Once Sony Vegas Pro 14 is done downloading, right click the .zip file and click on “Extract to Sony Vegas Pro 14” (To do this you must have WinRAR).

4. Go inside the folder you extracted and double click the Sony Vegas Pro 14.0.0.161 file and run the setup.

5. Select a language and click Next > Agree to terms > Create a shortcut to desktop > and click Install.

6. Once you’re done, run the Sony Vegas Pro 14 Patch and click the first left button. If you get a error message, click ignore and finish.

            SONY VEGAS PRO 14 FREE DOWNLOAD

Click the download button below to start Sony Vegas Pro 14 Free Download. It is the full version of Sony Vegas Pro. Don’t forget to share with your friends.

SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

Processor: Intel® Core™ 2 Duo 2.0 GHz or better

RAM: 4 GB

OS: Windows® 7/Vista/XP

Graphics: Video card must be 500 mb or more and should have the latest driver

Hard Drive: 500 mb available space.

VEGAS Pro 16 offers the exact software version you need. All VEGAS Pro versions have one thing in common and that's that they offer incredible performance for the highest demands in video editing. Learn about the most important features in each version to find which one is right for you. New features include advanced archival tools, sophisticated audio metering, and the Vegas Pro Connect mobile iPad companion app.

Precise editing tools

Edit SD, HD, or 3D video with drag-and-drop functionality, extensive editing tools, and incomparable video effects. Features include stereoscopic 3D support, multicamera editing, 32-bit floating-point video processing, video stabilization, customizable window layouts, HDV/ AVCHD/ RED/ SDI/ XDCAM/ HDCAM SR support, and A/V synchronization detection and repair.

GPU Accelerated Performance

Working with OpenCL supported devices from AMD and NVIDIA, Vegas Pro 11 leverages GPU acceleration for video FX, transitions, compositing, pan/crop, track motion and encoding, providing a significantly faster workflow. The addition of GPU acceleration streamlines the video editing experience in Vegas Po 11 by providing playback performance gains and faster rendering times, ideal for industry professionals who work on tight deadlines where every second counts.

Stereoscopic 3D editing

Create breathtaking stereoscopic 3D projects with the same ease and agility as the Vegas Pro 2D workflow. Vegas Pro 11 provides the ability to easily import, adjust, edit, preview, and output stereoscopic 3D media — all using industry-standard professional delivery formats including single or dual files with side-by-side, top/bottom, or line-alternate encoding. Anaglyphic monitoring and output are also supported.

NewBlue Titler Pro

Create 3D titles with Titler Pro, an exceptional new titler from NewBlueFX. Titler Pro enables users to add animations, professional-style templates, and effects to their titles. Work in real-time with GPU-accelerated effects and transitions and easily move text on the X, Y, and Z axes, all within the Vegas Pro workspace. Titler Pro is the perfect addition to the stereoscopic 3D toolset.

Superior audio control

Access unlimited audio tracks, 24-bit/192 kHz audio, punch-in recording, 5.1 surround mixing, effects automation, and time compress/expand, while applying customizable, real-time audio effects like EQ, Reverb, Delay, and more. Expand your audio processing and mixing options with supported third-party VST audio plug-ins. Use the Mixing Console for precise audio control.

Powerful Blu-ray Disc authoring

Burn movies to Blu-ray Disc directly from the Vegas Pro 11 timeline for high-definition delivery. Use DVD Architect Pro software (included with the Vegas Pro 11 collection) to author DVDs or Blu-ray Discs with subtitles, multiple languages, and numerous playback menus. Preview and test your work in real time. Apply Brightness and Contrast, Crop, and Anti-Flicker filters. Add high-quality preset backgrounds and themes to add life to any project. Set CSS and Macrovision copy-protection flags for masters.

Professional 32- and 64-bit workflow

The Vegas Pro interface provides a fully customizable workspace for accomplishing a wide range of production requirements. Dock multiple windows across multiple monitors and save your layouts to fit specific editing tasks. Nest Vegas Pro projects within the timeline, customize and save keyboard commands, and use application scripting to automate repetitive tasks.

Broad format support

Vegas Pro software natively supports the newest professional camcorder formats including XDCAM, NXCAM, AVCHD, and RED. Vegas Pro 11 software also includes support for still images greater than one gigapixel in resolution. Use the Pan and Scan tools to create stunning movie sequences from these large pictures while maintaining beautiful HD resolution.

What's New:

Accelerate Your Creativity

• VEGAS Pro 16 comes loaded with powerful new video editing features to help you work faster, smarter, and more creatively. The new version delivers on every level, with more flexibility, more power, and more professional features.

Motion Tracking

• Sophisticated and flexible masking technology coupled with rock-solid motion tracking give you the ability to follow moving objects through your scene. You can easily track their motion and "pin" text and video to them. You can also apply color grading and other creative effects that follow tracked objects wherever they go. Integrated motion tracking developed by the VEGAS team specifically for VEGAS Pro provides lock-tight tracking results.

Video Stabilization

• Turn shaky footage into smooth, pro-quality video in no time. The video stabilization engine has been completely rebuilt from the ground up to be far more powerful and easy to use. Get smooth results every time even on source material that was unusable before.

Dynamic storyboard and timeline interaction

• The dynamic storyboard workflow might just change the way you edit from now on. Quickly assemble rough cuts and alternate versions in an uncomplicated storyboard environment. Changes made to the main storyboard are reflected instantaneously in the timeline. In reverse, edits on the timeline can be synchronized to the storyboard with one click, or automatically as you edit. You can also create additional storyboards for experimental edits, alternate sequencing, or to keep track of different sections within your video.

Extensive file backup options

• VEGAS Pro 16 features a comprehensive list of file backup options. You can back up your work after a set time (determined in minutes and hours) and keep any number of daily backups. You can automatically save the current project and a backup file after every edit. All backups can be saved to the same folder as the project file, a temporary location, or any user-specified location, and opened anytime you want to return to them.

Drag media bin to timeline

• Save time! Files don't need to be added one by one anymore. You can now drag media bins (which also include the new storyboard bins) directly to the project timeline to add all of the bin's media files simultaneously.

Resizable media thumbnails

• Project media thumbnails can now be enlarged so you can see more detail and achieve greater hover scrub accuracy. You now see a more accurate location of specific video frames and can edit with much finer hover scrubbing and more exact in/out marking.

Project media hover scrub

• Hover scrubbing project media thumbnails gives you a quick way to identify the important points in your video files before you add them to your timeline. Simply move the mouse over a thumbnail in the Project Media window and scrub through the video to find a specific frame.

Project media in/out points

• With the ability to place the hover scrub cursor at an exact frame within the Project Media thumbnail, you can now create an In or Out point at that location. When the file is added to the project, the resulting event will then automatically be trimmed down to these defined in/out points. You can set in and out points for any type of media file in your project.

Preview multiple selected project media files

• It's now possible to select more than one media file in the Project Media window and preview each file, one after the other, in one continuous operation. This is great when you are working with storyboards because you will quickly be able to preview the entire storyboard in sequence.

Close gaps

• Now you can easily and automatically close the gaps between any selected events on a track within a project. This helps you quickly clean up your projects and ensures you have no black frames between edits.

Select events from cursor

• You can now select events from the current cursor position, including all events on selected tracks or within the entire project from the cursor to the end. It's a great way to quickly create space within a project to insert other events.

Donwload links for previous versions:

Requirements:

• Operating system: Microsoft® Windows 7 (64-bit), Windows 8 (64-bit) or Windows 10 (64-bit)
• Processor: 2.5 GHz 4-core processor (3 Ghz and 8 cores recommended for 4K)
• RAM: 8 GB RAM minimum (16 GB recommended; 32 GB recommended for 4K)
• Hard drive space: 1.5 GB hard-disk space for program installation; Solid-state disk (SSD) or high-speed multi-disk RAID for 4K media
• Graphics card: Supported NVIDIA®: For hardware rendering (NVEnc), GeForce 9XX series or higher with 4 GB; AMD/ATI®: Radeon with 4 GB and VCE 3.0 or higher (Radeon Pro series with 8 GB for HDR and 32 bit projects) or Intel®: GPU HD Graphics 530 series or higher
• Other: Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0 SP1 (included on application disc)
• Internet connection: Required for registering and validating the program, as well as for some program functions. Program requires one-time registration.