Best PC For Music Production 2017 Archives

Best PC For Music Production 2017 Archives

Best PC For Music Production 2017 Archives

Best PC For Music Production 2017 Archives

Best Computer For Recording Music at Home

Have you been looking for the best computer for recording music at home? These days, a musician has plenty of options to choose from. Recording your own music is more affordable now than ever before, and a person can find something that’s right for them no matter what their budget is.

In fact, there are so many options that it could get a little confusing. There are a lot of things to consider. Should you buy a Mac or a PC? How much memory will you require? How much money should you spend? These are all questions you need to answer when shopping for the best computer for recording music at home.

Facts About the Best Computer for Recording Music

at Home

Here are some need to know facts about the best computer for recording music at home.

Recording music is going to require quite a bit of speed and memory. As such, the best computer for recording music at home should have a few things right off the bat. You’re going to want at 500 GB SSD and 8 GB of RAM. You should also have an i5 processor at the very least. Furthermore, you’ll want a nice, big screen to work with. Ideally, you should have a monitor with at least 15 inches.

Should you get a desktop or a laptop?

The answer to this question will largely depend on how you plan to use your computer. A laptop has one very obvious advantage. It’s mobile. That can make it much easier to work with friends and bandmates. A laptop is also great for live performances or making music on the go in general.

However, if you predict your home studio will mostly stay in one place, then the best computer for recording music at home will be a desktop. They tend to be faster, and they allow for greater customization. That allows you to add more RAM or extra hard drives as needed. That said, modern-day laptops are very powerful in their own right and are still a legitimate choice for home recording artists.

As you probably already know, the Mac vs. PC debate is a hugely controversial topic that will continue for a very long time. In truth, both have their advantages and disadvantages. The fact that this is such a hotly debated topic shows they’re both legitimate choices for recording music. The decision will largely come down to personal preference.

The main thing to consider is which DAW, or digital workstation you’ll be using. That's the software you’ll use to record your music. Some DAWs are more compatible with Mac than PC and vice versa. For example, Garageband and Logic X are both compatible with Mac only. Most DAWs are cross-compatible these days, but this is still something you should check before making a decision.

How Much Will a Home Recording Computer Cost?

 Image via Pixabay

As you might expect, the best computer for recording music at home won’t be cheap. After all, this is a big investment that you want to last for a long time. Still, it might not be as expensive as you think. A good home recording computer can cost as little as $500 or as much as $2,500. Macs tend to be more expensive than PCs, and desktops are usually more expensive than laptops.

Also, keep in mind that a good home recording studio will require other gear as well. That includes software, microphones, speakers, etc. These things also need to be taken into account when deciding your budget.


For the most part, we used Amazon to find the basic features and specs for the following computers. Additionally, we put great emphasis on customer reviews from Amazon. When making this list, we tried to include a good balance of laptops, desktops, Macs, and PCs to account for different preferences. That will help you decide on the best computer for music at home.

PreviewProduct
Apple iMac (21.5-inch, 8GB RAM, 1TB Storage) - Silver (Previous Model) Check Price
Acer Aspire TC-885-ACCFLi5 Desktop, 8th Gen Intel Core i5-8400, 12GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 8X DVD, 802.11ac... Check Price
Oemgenuine Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E485 14 Inch FHD Display, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U Quad Core, 8GB RAM,... Check Price
Apple MacBook Pro (13-Inch, 8GB RAM, 128GB Storage, 2.3GHz Intel Core i5) - Silver (Previous Model) Check Price
Dell Inspiron High Performance Tower Computer PC (Intel Quad Core i7-7700, 16GB_DDR4 Ram,... Check Price
Apple Mac mini, 2.6GHz Intel Core i5 Dual Core, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD, Mac OS, Silver, MGEN2LL/A (Newest... Check Price

The Best Home Recording Computers

Now that you have an idea of what to look for, let’s take a look at what’s on the market. All of these are worthy contenders for the best computer for recording music at home.


The Apple iMac is often considered the best computer for recording music at home. This desktop looks great and has a lot going for it. It features seventh-generation Intel Core i5 and i7 processors. It also has a Fusion Drive which makes it super fast and gives it plenty of memory. This computer comes with Radeon Pro 500 graphics which makes everything easier to see and two Thunderbolt 3 USB-C ports. It’s five-millimeter screen also creates plenty of space for your home studio.

Most customers have enjoyed this computer. They liked that it was easy to use and set up, and they also appreciated that you could upgrade the memory. Recording artists, in particular, liked that it’s compatible with DAWs such as Pro Tools and Logic. Most complaints have been relatively minor. A few customers complained about it being a bit slow, and the mouse needs occasional charging.

The cost of an Apple iMac can vary considerably depending on the screen size and the specific model you choose. Overall, this is likely the computer you’ll choose if you want an Apple desktop. It’s compatible with all the best DAWs and has everything a home recording artist needs. Customers on Amazon gave it 4.2 out of 5 stars.

The first PC desktop on our list is the Acer Aspire. This computer features an Intel Core i5-8400 processor. That gives it the storage and speed you need for recording music. It also uses 802.11ac wireless technology. Having this will help you keep your workspace clean, which in turn improves efficiency. Furthermore, Acer has an excellent community that can help you get up and running if you have any trouble getting started. This computer has 8 GB of RAM.

Many customers described this as a good entry-level computer. It’s very easy to set up, and while it’s stats aren’t exactly mindblowing, they get the job done. On the downside, many people described its mouse and keyboard as rather cheap and generic. Also, you have limited ability to upgrade this computer.

That makes it one of the most affordable computers on this list. It’s a good computer that will do everything you need if you’re on a budget. However, its limited ability to upgrade could eventually become problematic. If you can, you might want to save your money and invest in something with a little more power. Amazon gives it 4.1 out of 5 stars.

Acer Aspire TC-885-ACCFLi5 Desktop, 8th Gen Intel Core i5-8400, 12GB DDR4, 2TB HDD, 8X DVD, 802.11ac WiFi, Windows 10 Home
  • 8th Generation Intel Core i5-8400 Processor (Up to 4.0GHz)
  • 12GB DDR4 2666MHz Memory, 2TB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive & 8X DVD-Writer Double-Layer Drive (DVD-RW)
  • 802.11ac Wi-Fi, Gigabit Ethernet LAN & Bluetooth 5.0
  • 1 - USB 3.1 Type C Gen 2 port (up to 10 Gbps), 1 - USB 3.1 Gen 2 Port, 2 - USB 3.1 Gen 1 Ports, 4 - USB 2.0 Ports & 2 - HDMI Ports & 1 - VGA Port
  • Windows 10 Home. Wireless LAN Standard - IEEE 802.11ac

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E470

The Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E470 is the first laptop on our list and an excellent choice if you’re shopping for the best computer for recording music at home. It comes equipped with an Intel Core i5-6200U processor. It also has 8GB of RAM and a 250GB SSD. Additionally, it has a 14-inch screen and a fingerprint reader. All of its stats can be configured and upgraded at a later time if needed.

Most customers have been very happy with this laptop. They said it’s durable, lightweight, and performs well. All of these qualities are extremely useful for a musician on the go. However, a few people have complained about the viewing angles not being great. That could be a problem since you’ll be staring at the screen for long periods when you’re recording. Also, some customers had trouble upgrading to Windows 10. That could be an issue if that’s your preferred OS.

That's fairly reasonable for a home recording laptop. Overall, it has a lot of good things going for it. It’s a great choice if you like PCs and want something portable and reliable. Amazon gives it 4.0 out of 5 stars.

If you’d prefer a Mac laptop, you might consider the Apple MacBook Pro instead. It uses a 2.3 GHz Dual-core Intel Core i5 processor and has up to 32GB of memory. Depending on the model you get, it also has up to a 2TB or 4TB SSD. There are also four ports, which is useful for connecting devices such as audio interfaces. Like the Apple iMac, it uses Radeon Pro graphics. The Apple MacBook Pro is available in 13-inch and 15-inch models.

Customers have loved just how powerful this little laptop is. It’s very fast, has lots of memory, and has an impressive battery life. That makes it a very good computer for long recording sessions. On top of that, it’s also incredibly light. The most common complaint was about the keyboard. Many people described it as unintuitive and more strenuous than it needs to be. Luckily, this isn’t too much of an issue for musicians.

Like most Apple computers, the price can vary dramatically depending on the model you choose. If you’re looking for a Mac laptop, then this is the computer for you. It has all of the power and portability you could ask for. Unfortunately, you’ll have to question whether or not you can afford it. Amazon gave it 4.0 out of 5 stars.

The Dell Inspiron is a great PC desktop from the long-running Dell brand. While Dell hasn’t always been a viable music-making option, this model has the stats to give you what you need. This computer has a 7th-generation Intel Core i7-7700 processor. It also has 16GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD. All of these stats are upgradable as needed. Of course, Dell also has a useful support community if you need help getting started.

Most customers have been very happy with this computer. They said it was very fast and could easily run multiple programs at one time. That's potentially very helpful for home recording artists. It’s also very easy to set up. Unfortunately, a few customers have questioned its quality. Many had technical issues after using it for a short period of time.

It’s a good computer with a lot of power, and it won’t hurt your wallet too much. It’s a great choice if you’re shopping on a budget. However, you have to question how long it will last. You definitely don’t want any technical problems when you’re in the middle of a big project. This computer has 4.7 out of 5 stars on Amazon.

The Apple Mac Mini is a unique product that’s gaining popularity among musicians. It’s technically a desktop, but it’s small enough to be portable like a laptop. It consists of a 7.7 x 7.7-inch block of aluminum that’s only 2.7 pounds. Depending on the model, this computer has either a 2.6 or 2.8GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 processor. It also has a 1TB Fusion drive. This computer uses Intel Iris graphics.

Most customers appreciated the fact that this is one of the most affordable Apple computers. That makes it a great option if you’re looking for a Mac that won’t cost a ton of money. They also felt it was easy to set up, and its small size makes it easy to customize your work area. Unfortunately, it’s also a bit slower than most of the computers on this list. Also, the fact that you can’t upgrade its memory could eventually become a problem.

Again, it’s much more affordable than most Apple computers. It’s small size also makes it the best of both worlds when it comes to laptops and desktops. However, you might want to invest something else if you have the money. The best computer for recording music at home needs plenty of speed and power, and the Apple Mac Mini can only go so far in those categories. Amazon gives it 4.2 out of 5 stars.

Apple Mac mini, 2.6GHz Intel Core i5 Dual Core, 8GB RAM, 1TB HDD, Mac OS, Silver, MGEN2LL/A (Newest Version) (Renewed)
  • Renewed products look and work like new. These pre-owned products have been inspected and tested by Amazon-qualified suppliers, which typically perform a full diagnostic test, replacement of any defective parts, and a thorough cleaning process. Packaging and accessories may be generic. All products on Amazon Renewed come with a minimum 90-day supplier-backed warranty.
  • Carved from a Solid block of aluminum, Mac mini has a seamless, unique look that is unmistakably Mac.
  • macOS Sierra brings lots of useful enhancements to your Mac.
  • Every new Mac comes with photos, iMovie, garageband, pages, numbers, and keynote.
  • 2.6GHz dual-core Intel Core i5

Which Computer Should You Choose?

At the end of the day, your decision will depend on a number of factors, First and foremost, what’s your budget? Second, what do you plan to do? Do you plan to build your own studio, or do you need the ability to make music wherever you go?

If you’re a Mac person, you’ll most likely choose the Apple iMac or Apple MacBook Pro. If you prefer PC, you might go with the Lenovo ThinkPad or Dell Inspiron. The Acer Aspire is also a good alternative if you’re on a budget. Keeping these things in mind will help you find the best computer for recording music at home.

Источник: [https://torrent-igruha.org/3551-portal.html]
, Best PC For Music Production 2017 Archives

Choosing the Best Laptop for Music Production

   Mobility

If you’re planning to use your laptop for live recording or performing, a smaller model is usually a better choice because it’s easier to carry and takes up less space on stage. Another consideration in these applications is battery life. This isn’t important in homes or clubs where there’s an outlet nearby, but might be vital for mobile recording. Also, if you’re planning to use your laptop for a performance or to record in clubs, it’s a good idea to choose a model with a backlit keyboard.

Mac or Windows?

MacBooks are fast and reliable, yet there are some equally powerful Windows laptops, typically at more affordable prices. This choice depends mainly on two factors: your budget and which software you prefer to use. Note that professional music studios tend to use Macs, so if you plan to work in conjunction with pro studios—recording a few tracks in a large room, perhaps, or hiring a pro to mix or master your recording—a Mac might be a safer choice, although audio files from Windows machines can be transferred to Mac OS and vice-versa.

More information can be found in our PC vs Mac article ›

Processor

Music production can put a heavy load on a CPU, or processor, which is the heart of any computer. Get the best, most capable processor within your budget because it’s rarely possible to upgrade it later. The more complicated your productions, the more the CPU matters. Mixing a tune with 30 tracks, multiple sampled instruments, and lots of digital audio effects demands a powerful computer.

There are two measures of processor performance to keep in mind. One is the number of cores. Each core can process data independently, so adding cores dramatically increases processing power. A quad-core processor is the best choice for music production. The other measure is clock speed, which typically runs from about 2.4 to 4.2 GHz. The faster the better.

Typically, a more compact laptop will have a less-powerful processor, but that’s not always true.

RAM

RAM, or random-access memory, stores programs and data temporarily when your computer is on. The more complex the program, the more RAM it requires.

For music production, you need at least 8 GB and preferably 16 GB of RAM, especially if you’re working with a lot of recorded tracks and/or virtual instruments, or applying multiple effects to your tracks. Luckily, RAM is one of the more upgradeable components of a computer, but every laptop has its limits. It’s best to choose one that can accommodate at least 16 GB of RAM.

Storage: HDD or SSD?                                                                                    

Audio files take up a lot of storage space: Just one complicated tune can easily fill 1 GB. This is why it’s a good idea to have at least 1TB of available storage.

How that storage is arranged is a different issue. Your options are a conventional hard drive (HDD) that relies on one or more internal spinning discs, a solid-state drive (SSD) with no moving parts, or an external HDD, which connects to your laptop through USB.

An SSD can read and write data much faster than an HDD and it’s quieter and more reliable. However, an SSD is typically about five times as costly per GB as an HDD. One solution, if your laptop permits it, is to have a 128 or 256 GB SSD plus a 1TB HDD. This way, boot-up and loading of programs from the SSD are ultra-fast, and you have plenty of storage for music files on the HDD.

Another solution is to keep your music files—or at least your archived ones—on an external HDD. This method adds complexity, but it lets you add more storage when you need it, and it does let you opt for a smaller, slimmer computer.

Ports

To interface a laptop with microphones, instruments, and other audio gear, you’ll need an audio interface, which will connect to the laptop through a USB port. If you’re producing music directly on the laptop, you’ll also use USB to connect a keyboard, MIDI pads (for tapping out rhythms), and DJ controllers. Many music pros like to use control surfaces, which provide a physical interface much like a mixing board, instead of controlling their recording and audio mixing using a mouse.

Laptops come with at least two USB ports, but obviously you may want more, especially if you want to connect peripherals such as a wired keyboard or mouse, or an external hard drive. Any computer’s USB ports can be augmented by connecting a USB hub, but for portable users, that will be one more piece of gear to carry.

Speakers/headphone jacks

Surprisingly, these features don’t matter much in a laptop used for music production. The speakers built into laptops are very low-quality devices that are only there for situations where you have nothing else to listen through. Nothing will sound good through them, and if you try to tailor your mixes to sound good through them, the music will probably sound strange when played on good speakers. You can use the headphone jack built into the laptop, but in most laptops, the amplifier connected to the headphone jack is of low quality and may throw off the sound of your headphones a bit.

Fortunately, most audio interfaces have headphone jacks as well as connections that allow you to hook up a set of high-quality powered monitor speakers that will let you do great-sounding mixes. Because isn’t it a little crazy to invest hours in choosing the right laptop, and hundreds of hours in producing a piece of music, only to listen to it through poor-quality speakers?

Final Tracks

Once you’ve chosen the laptop, audio interface, and the DAW software that’s best for your needs, you’ll be ready to create studio-quality music productions. In fact, a lot of the music you hear on the radio is created using nothing more. All you need to add is your own creativity and imagination.

Источник: [https://torrent-igruha.org/3551-portal.html]
Best PC For Music Production 2017 Archives

Music sequencer

A music sequencer (or audio sequencer or simply sequencer) is a device or application software that can record, edit, or play back music, by handling note and performance information in several forms, typically CV/Gate, MIDI, or Open Sound Control (OSC), and possibly audio and automation data for DAWs and plug-ins.[note 1][1]

Overview[edit]

Modern sequencers[edit]

The advent of Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI) and the Atari ST home computer in the 1980s gave programmers the opportunity to design software that could more easily record and play back sequences of notes played or programmed by a musician. This software also improved on the quality of the earlier sequencers which tended to be mechanical sounding and were only able to play back notes of exactly equal duration. Software-based sequencers allowed musicians to program performances that were more expressive and more human. These new sequencers could also be used to control external synthesizers, especially rackmountedsound modules, and it was no longer necessary for each synthesizer to have its own devoted keyboard.

As the technology matured, sequencers gained more features, such as the ability to record multitrack audio. Sequencers used for audio recording are called digital audio workstations (or DAWs).

Many modern sequencers can be used to control virtual instruments implemented as software plug-ins. This allows musicians to replace expensive and cumbersome standalone synthesizers with their software equivalents.

Today the term "sequencer" is often used to describe software. However, hardware sequencers still exist. Workstation keyboards have their own proprietary built-in MIDI sequencers. Drum machines and some older synthesizers have their own step sequencer built in. There are still also standalone hardware MIDI sequencers, although the market demand for those has diminished greatly due to the greater feature set of their software counterparts.

Types of music sequencer[edit]

Music sequencers can be categorized by handling data types, such as:

Alternative subsets of audio sequencers include:

Digital audio workstation (DAW), Hard disk recorder — a class of audio software or dedicated system primarily designed to record, edit, and play back digital audio, first appeared in the late 1970s and emerging since the 1990s. After the 1990s–2000s, several DAWs for music production were integrated with music sequencer.

In today, "DAW integrated with MIDI sequencer" is often simply abbreviated as "DAW", or sometimes referred as "Audio and MIDI sequencer",[7]etc. On the later usage, the term "audio sequencer" is just a synonym for the "DAW".

Loop-based music software — a class of music software for Loop-based music compositions and remix, emerging since late 1990s. Typical software included ACID Pro (1998), Ableton Live (2001), GarageBand (2004), etc. And now, several of them are referred as DAW, resulting of the expansions and/or integrations.
Its core feature, pitch/time manipulation allows user to handle audio samples (loops) with the analogy of MIDI data, in several aspects; user can designate Pitches and Durations independently on short music samples, as on MIDI notes, to remix a song.

This type of software really controls sequences of audio samples; thus, possibly, we can call it an "audio sequencer".

Beat slicing — before the DAW became popular, several musicians sometimes derived various beats from limited drum sample Loop by slicing beats and rearranging them on samplers. This technique was popularized with the introduction of "beat slicer" tool, especially the "ReCycle" released in 1992.

Possibly it may be one origin of "audio sequencing".

Also, music sequencer can be categorized by its construction and supporting modes.

Realtime sequencer (realtime recording mode)[edit]

A realtime sequencer on the synthesizer

Realtime sequencers record the musical notes in real-time as on audio recorders, and play back musical notes with designated tempo, quantizations, and pitch. For editing, usually "punch in/punch out" features originated in the tape recording are provided, although it requires sufficient skills to obtain the desired result. For detailed editing, possibly another visual editing mode under graphical user interface may be more suitable. Anyway, this mode provides usability similar to audio recorders already familiar to musicians, and it is widely supported on software sequencers, DAWs, and built-in hardware sequencers.

Analog sequencer[edit]

Analog sequencers are typically implemented with analog electronics, and play the musical notes designated by a series of knobs or sliders corresponding to each musical note (step). It is designed for both composition and live performance; users can change the musical notes at any time without regarding recording mode. And also possibly, the time-interval between each musical note (length of each step) can be independently adjustable. Typically, analog sequencers are used to generate the repeated minimalistic phrases which may be reminiscent of Tangerine Dream, Giorgio Moroder or trance music.

Step sequencer (step recording mode)[edit]

step rhythm sequencer on the drum machine
A step note sequencer on the bass machine

On step sequencers, musical notes are rounded into steps of equal time-intervals, and users can enter each musical note without exact timing; instead, the timing and duration of each step can be designated in several different ways:

  • On the drum machines: select a trigger timing from a row of step-buttons.
  • On the bass machines: select a step note (or rest) from a chromatic keypads, then select a step duration (or tie) from a group of length-buttons, sequentially.
  • On the several home keyboards:in addition to the realtime sequencer, a pair of step trigger button is provided; using it, notes on the pre-recorded sequence can be triggered in arbitrary timings for the timing dedicated recordings or performances. (See List of music sequencers#Step sequencers (supported on).)

In general, step mode, along with roughly quantized semi-realtime mode, is often supported on the drum machines, bass machines and several groove machines.

Software sequencer[edit]

Software sequencer is a class of application software providing a functionality of music sequencer, and often provided as one feature of the DAW or the integrated music authoring environments. The features provided as sequencers vary widely depending on the software; even an analog sequencer can be simulated. The user may control the software sequencer either by using the graphical user interfaces or a specialized input devices, such as a MIDI controller.

Typical features on software sequencers

History[edit]

Early sequencers[edit]

The early music sequencers were sound producing devices such as automatic musical instruments, music boxes, mechanical organs, player pianos, and Orchestrions. Player pianos, for example, had much in common with contemporary sequencers. Composers or arrangers transmitted music to piano rolls which were subsequently edited by technicians who prepared the rolls for mass duplication. Eventually consumers were able to purchase these rolls and play them back on their own player pianos.

The origin of automatic musical instruments seems remarkably old. As early as the 9th century, the Persian (Iranian) Banū Mūsā brothers invented a hydropoweredorgan using exchangeable cylinders with pins,[8] and also an automaticflute playing machine using steam power,[9][10] as described in their Book of Ingenious Devices. The Banu Musa brothers' automatic flute player was the first programmable music sequencer device,[11] and the first example of repetitive music technology, powered by hydraulics.[12]

In 1206, Al-Jazari, an Arab engineer, invented programmable musical automata,[13][13] a "robotband" which performed "more than fifty facial and body actions during each musical selection."[14] It was notably the first programmable drum machine. Among the four automaton musicians were two drummers. It was a drum machine where pegs (cams) bump into little levers that operated the percussion. The drummers could be made to play different rhythms and different drum patterns if the pegs were moved around.[15]

In the 14th century, rotating cylinders with pins were used to play a carillon (steam organ) in Flanders,[citation needed] and at least in the 15th century, barrel organs were seen in the Netherlands.[16]

In the late-18th or early-19th century, with technological advances of the Industrial Revolution various automatic musical instruments were invented. Some examples: music boxes, barrel organs and barrel pianos consisting of a barrel or cylinder with pins or a flat metal disc with punched holes; or mechanical organs, player pianos and orchestrions using book music / music rolls (piano rolls) with punched holes, etc. These instruments were disseminated widely as popular entertainment devices prior to the inventions of phonographs, radios, and sound films which eventually eclipsed all such home music production devices. Of them all, punched-paper-tape media had been used until the mid-20th century. The earliest programmable music synthesizers including the RCA Mark II Sound Synthesizer in 1957, and the Siemens Synthesizer in 1959, were also controlled via punch tapes similar to piano rolls.[17][18][19]

Additional inventions grew out of sound film audio technology. The drawn sound technique which appeared in the late 1920s, is notable as a precursor of today's intuitive graphical user interfaces. In this technique, notes and various sound parameters are triggered by hand-drawn black ink waveforms directly upon the film substrate, hence they resemble piano rolls (or the 'strip charts' of the modern sequencers/DAWs). Drawn soundtrack was often used in early experimental electronic music, including the Variophone developed by Yevgeny Sholpo in 1930, and the Oramics designed by Daphne Oram in 1957, and so forth.

Analog sequencers[edit]

Earliest commercially available analog sequencers (bottom) on Buchla 100 (1964/1966)[20]
Moog sequencer module (left, probably added after 1968) on Moog Modular (1964)
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it.(April 2017)

During the 1940s–1960s, Raymond Scott, an American composer of electronic music, invented various kind of music sequencers for his electric compositions. The "Wall of Sound", once covered on the wall of his studio in New York during the 1940s–1950s, was an electro-mechanical sequencer to produce rhythmic patterns, consisting of stepping relays (used on dial pulsetelephone exchange), solenoids, control switches, and tone circuits with 16 individual oscillators.[21] Later, Robert Moog would explain it in such terms as "the whole room would go 'clack - clack - clack', and the sounds would come out all over the place".[22] The Circle Machine, developed in 1959, had dimmer bulbs arranged in a ring, and a rotating arm with photocell scanning over the ring, to generate an arbitrary waveform. Also, the rotating speed of the arm was controlled via the brightness of lights, and as a result, arbitrary rhythms were generated.[23]

Clavivox, developed since 1952, was a kind of keyboard synthesizer with sequencer.[verification needed] On its prototype, a theremin manufactured by young Robert Moog was utilized to enable portamento over 3-octave range, and on later version, it was replaced by a pair of photographic film and photocell for controlling the pitch by voltage.[22]

In 1968 Ralph Lundsten and Leo Nilsson had a polyphonic synthesizer with sequencer called Andromatic built for them by Erkki Kurenniemi.[24]

Step sequencers[edit]

The step sequencers played rigid patterns of notes using a grid of (usually) 16 buttons, or steps, each step being 1/16 of a measure. These patterns of notes were then chained together to form longer compositions. Sequencers of this kind are still in use, mostly built into drum machines and grooveboxes. They are monophonic by nature, although some are multi-timbral, meaning that they can control several different sounds but only play one note on each of those sounds.[clarification needed]

Early computers[edit]

On the other hand, software sequencers were continuously utilized since the 1950s in the context of computer music, including computer-played music (software sequencer), computer-composed music (music synthesis), and computer sound generation (sound synthesis). In June 1951, the first computer music Colonel Bogey was played on CSIRAC, Australia's first digital computer.[28][29] In 1956, Lejaren Hiller at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign wrote one of the earliest programs for computer music composition on ILLIAC, and collaborated on the first piece, Illiac Suite for String Quartet, with Leonard Issaction.[30] In 1957 Max Mathews at Bell Labs wrote MUSIC, the first widely used program for sound generation, and a 17-second composition was performed by the IBM 704 computer. Subsequently, computer music was mainly researched on the expensive mainframe computers in computer centers, until the 1970s when minicomputers and then microcomputers became available in this field.

In Japan, experiments in computer music date back to 1962, when Keio University professor Sekine and Toshiba engineer Hayashi experimented with the TOSBAC computer. This resulted in a piece entitled TOSBAC Suite.[31]

DDP-24 S Block (expansion card rack unit) that is assumed the A/D converters used for GROOVE (1970) by Max Mathews.

In 1965,[32] Mathews and L. Rosler developed Graphic 1, an interactive graphical sound system (that implies sequencer) on which one could draw figures using a light-pen that would be converted into sound, simplifying the process of composing computer generated music.[33][34] It used PDP-5 minicomputer for data input, and IBM 7094 mainframe computer for rendering sound. Also in 1970, Mathews and F. R. Moore developed the GROOVE (Generated Real-time Output Operations on Voltage-controlled Equipment) system,[35] a first fully developed music synthesis system for interactive composition (that implies sequencer) and realtime performance, using 3C/HoneywellDDP-24[36] (or DDP-224[37]) minicomputers. It used a CRT display to simplify the management of music synthesis in realtime, 12bit D/A for realtime sound playback, an interface for analog devices, and even several controllers including a musical keyboard, knobs, and rotating joysticks to capture realtime performance.[33][37][34]

Digital sequencers[edit]

In 1971, Electronic Music Studios (EMS) released one of the first digital sequencer products as a module of Synthi 100, and its derivation, Synthi Sequencer series.[38][39] After then, Oberheim released the DS-2 Digital Sequencer in 1974,[40] and Sequential Circuits released Model 800 in 1977 [41]

Fairlight CMI (1979) supporting MCL (sequencer)

Music workstations[edit]

In 1975, New England Digital (NED) released ABLE computer (microcomputer)[42] as a dedicated data processing unit for Dartmouth Digital Synthesizer (1973), and based on it, later Synclavier series were developed.

The Synclavier I, released in September 1977,[43] was one of the earliest digital music workstation product with multitrack sequencer. Synclavier series evolved throughout the late-1970s to the mid-1980s, and they also established integration of digital-audio and music-sequencer, on their Direct-to-Disk option in 1984, and later Tapeless Studio system.

In 1982, renewed the Fairlight CMI Series II and added new sequencer software "Page R", which combined step sequencing with sample playback.[44]

Yamaha's GS-1, their first FMdigital synthesizer, was released in 1980.[45] To program the synthesizer, Yamaha built a custom computer workstation designed to be used as a sequencer for the GS-1[citation needed][failed verification]. It was only available at Yamaha's headquarters in Japan (Hamamatsu) and the United States (Buena Park).[citation needed]

Standalone CV/Gate sequencers[edit]

While there were earlier microprocessor-based sequencers for digital polyphonic synthesizers,[note 4] their early products tended to prefer the newer internal digital buses than the old-style analogue CV/Gate interface once used on their prototype system. Then in the early-1980s, they also re-recognized the needs of CV/Gate interface, and supported it along with MIDI as options.

In 1977, Roland Corporation released the MC-8 Microcomposer, also called

Источник: [https://torrent-igruha.org/3551-portal.html]
.

What’s New in the Best PC For Music Production 2017 Archives?

Screen Shot

System Requirements for Best PC For Music Production 2017 Archives

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *